No one wants an HB2 debate, again!
It is shocking that mayors in Charlotte and other North Carolina cities would spend time and effort to reboot the divisive and tired debate on HB2 which resulted in boycotts and lost business. At a time of high unemployment and looming municipal deficits when our communities should be working together to recover from COVID-19, we question their priorities.
Every person should be treated with dignity and respect. And our laws should protect the constitutionally guaranteed freedoms of every citizen, no matter who they are. Unfortunately, coercive sexual orientation and gender identity (“SOGI”) laws like the ordinances pushed by Equality NC undermine both fairness and freedom.
First, SOGI laws force people who willingly serve everyone to promote messages and celebrate events that conflict with their beliefs. They coerce uniformity of thought and speech on beliefs about marriage, sex, and what it means to be male and female. SOGI laws take away free speech and religious freedom for a vast number of Americans. In other states, government is using SOGI laws to punish people like Jack Phillips, Barronelle Stutzman, and Blaine Adamson for declining to create custom art that expresses messages that conflict with their beliefs. These ordinances are a Trojan horse to weaponize hate and hostility toward small business owners and private citizens with sincerely held religious beliefs. The Supreme Court ruled that small business owner Jack Phillips could not be forced by his city to promote a message that violated his religious beliefs, yet our city leaders have not learned from the mistakes made by other cities.
SOGI laws also create unfair playing fields for women and girls in athletics, business, and
education. SOGI laws nullify the opportunities promised by federal legislation like Title IX, which guarantees women equal access to scholarships and educational opportunities on the same basis as men. Biological males competing as women disadvantage women and rob them of the opportunity to medal, compete, and earn college scholarships. Allowing boys to compete in girls’ sports shatters dreams and steals opportunities. Girls deserve to compete on a level playing field.
SOGI laws harm efforts to find loving homes for kids in our nation’s overloaded foster care systems. SOGI laws force faith‐based adoption and foster care providers to violate their beliefs or stop their important work, meaning that fewer providers are working to help connect kids with a family. That is not keeping kids first.
Destructive gender ideology, which is enshrined under SOGI laws, threatens the right of parents to raise their children consistent with their beliefs.
People of faith should not be treated like second‐class citizens. Tolerance is a two‐way street. Tolerance and respect for good‐faith differences of opinion are essential in a pluralistic society like ours. They enable us to peacefully coexist with each other. SOGI laws ostracize and marginalize people who hold decent and honorable beliefs about marriage, sex, and gender.
The North Carolina Values Coalition urges mayors across North Carolina to heed the words of our own Constitution which says, “No human authority shall, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience” and the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent reaffirmation of religious liberty when it stated, “We are also deeply concerned with preserving the promise of the free exercise of religion enshrined in our Constitution; that guarantee lies at the heart of our pluralistic society.” People of faith should be welcome in our cities, not targeted and punished.
To city leaders across North Carolina, we say: listen to important stakeholders like female athletes, small business owners, and people of faith. Our voices are important. It’s time for a different approach.
Lobbyist Tami Fitzgerald is the Executive Director of the North Carolina Values Coalition, which seeks to advance faith, family, and freedom in the culture of North Carolina from a Christian worldview by engaging Christians in voting, informing voters about which candidates share their values, and advancing public policies that create a culture in which human life is valued, marriage and families flourish, and religious liberty thrives.
I agree
Excellent points. I would add the following (as one who has dealt with same-sex attraction):
The accumulated, illegitimate “non-discrimination” laws/ordinances of the past 50+ years need to be repealed. The SOGI aspects simply bring this need into sharp focus.
“Discrimination” is NOT a constitutional principle – the word does not appear in that document. The relevant principle is Liberty. After Liberty was first declared (1776) an unalienable (not government-given but Creator-endowed) right, “We, the People …. in order to secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity (did) ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.” So Liberty is the preeminent principle; it is a God-given right that is the basis for establishing our Constitution. Ergo, government’s chief duty is to protect “Liberty for all”; it has NO authority whatsoever to infringe on or deny Liberty to anyone.
Now, let this sink into your mind. Liberty is, in fact, our unalienable/constitutional right TO discriminate as individuals (persons and entities such as a business, church, etc.) – to make our own decisions (right or wrong) without government coercion. Government has NO authority to prohibit “individual” discrimination. A law/ordinance which designates any class of people (age, sex, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, etc.) as a protected class and prohibits discrimination by “individuals” is automatically anti-Liberty. This is the root problem today which must be corrected by properly re-asserting the preeminence of Liberty and relegating discrimination to it’s non-constitutional standing.
Examples: If a restaurant declines to serve me because I’m an “old guy” (age/sex discrimination), they are rightfully exercising their Liberty. As long as I can be served at another restaurant, I’m not being denied my Liberty. Similarly, if a Muslim employer declines to hire me for a job opening because I’m a Christian (religious discrimination), he is rightfully exercising his Liberty. But for government to compel the restaurant to serve me or the employer to hire me (using illegitimate non-discrimination laws) IS a denial of their rightful Liberty.
What about the 1964 Civil Rights Law? It was just and right, not because it “prohibited discrimination” on the basis of color (that was the unfortunate wording that has led to present disastrous consequences). The significance of the law was that it gave Black People the “Liberty” they had previously been denied, not by mere “individual” discrimination, but by “government” discrimination (Jim Crow/segregation laws). Today’s illegitimate “non-discrimination” laws are functioning like segregation laws; they are denying Liberty to all those not included in the designated “protected” class. Government’s job is NOT to protect people from individual discrimination, but to protect “Liberty for all”